We don't have any photos of this building yet. Why don't you be the first to send us one?
Latitude: 55.9592 / 55°57'33"N
Longitude: -3.1797 / 3°10'46"W
OS Eastings: 326444
OS Northings: 674652
OS Grid: NT264746
Mapcode National: GBR 8RC.D8
Mapcode Global: WH6SM.4G3X
Plus Code: 9C7RXR5C+M4
Entry Name: 54, 56, 58 Montgomery Street, Edinburgh
Listing Name: 54-58 (Even Nos) Montgomery Street and 23 Brunswick Street
Listing Date: 29 November 1988
Category: C
Source: Historic Scotland
Source ID: 366187
Historic Scotland Designation Reference: LB28372
Building Class: Cultural
ID on this website: 200366187
Location: Edinburgh
County: Edinburgh
Town: Edinburgh
Electoral Ward: Leith Walk
Traditional County: Midlothian
Tagged with: Architectural structure
Possibly designed by John Chesser, 1880s; built between 1896 and 1909. Classical, near-symmetrical, 4-storey, corner tenement block with splayed corner and distinctive Doric doorpiece and balcony to Brunswick Street. Polished ashlar; squared coursed rubble with dressed margins to rear. Base course; cill course to 2nd floor; dentilled main cornice dividing 2nd and 3rd floors; eaves cornice and blocking course. Regular fenestration; sunken panelled aprons to ground floor windows to Brunswick Street; architraved windows to Brunswick Street elevation and corner.
W (BRUNSWICK STREET) ELEVATION: 6-bay elevation. Dividing bands between ground and 1st floors; 1st floor cill cornice. To ground floor, to 4th bay from left, timber-panelled door with letterbox fanlight; doorpiece of attached fluted Greek Doric columns supporting entablature; above, wrought iron trellis pattern balcony with Greek key border. Bipartite windows to all floors to 3rd and 6th bays from left.
NW (CORNER) ELEVATION: single bay elevation. Dividing bands between ground and 1st floors; 1st floor cill cornice. Bipartite windows.
N (MONTGOMERY STREET) ELEVATION: 5-bay (8-bay to ground floor) elevation. To ground floor, to 2nd, 4th and 6th bays from left, timber-panelled doors with letterbox fanlights. 1st floor cill course. Bipartite windows to all floors to outer left bay and 2nd bay from right.
GLAZING etc: predominantly plate glass in timber sash and case windows. Platform roof; grey slate; stone skews and skewputts. To N elevation, 1 mutual rendered ridge stack to left, 2 wallhead stacks (ashlar stack to left), 1 rendered ridge stack to right; to W elevation, ashlar wallhead stack and ridge stack to centre; to S gable, gablehead stack; stacks predominantly corniced with circular cans.
The block comprising 54-58 Montgomery Street and 23 Brunswick Street forms part of the Eastern New Town (or Calton) scheme, which was originally laid out by W. H Playfair (see below). This block may have been designed by John Chesser who was involved, during the 1880s, with the completion of several of the streets which Playfair planned. Although this block was built several years later than the other buildings in the scheme which Chesser designed, it is possible that they were built using plans drawn up by Chesser. This means that the block comprising 54-58 Montgomery Street and 23 Brunswick Street is important due to its continuation of the street plan and elements of the Greek Revival style which are characteristic of the relatively few buildings of the scheme that were actually constructed to Playfair's designs. The Greek Doric doorpiece and the trellis and Greek key balcony are elements found in Playfair's designs for other streets in the Calton Scheme e.g. Hillside Crescent.
The origins of the Eastern New Town, which was to occupy the east end of Calton Hill and lands to the north of it on the ground between Easter Road and Leith Walk, lie in a 'joint plan for building' which three principal feuars (Heriot's Hospital, Trinity Hospital and Mr Allan of Hillside) entered into in 1811. In 1812 a competition was advertised for plans for laying out the grounds in question. Thirty-two plans were received, displayed and reported on by a variety of people, including eight architects. Eventually, it was decided that none of the plans was suitable. However, it was a more general report by William Stark (who died shortly after submitting it) which caught the attention of the Commissioners and formed the basis of the final scheme. Stark's central argument stressed the importance of planning around the natural contours and features of the land rather than imposing formal, symmetrical street plans upon it. After several years of little or no progress, in 1818 the Commissioners finally selected William Henry Playfair, Stark's former pupil, to plan a scheme following his master's Picturesque ideals.
The resulting scheme, presented to the Commissioners in 1819, preserved the view of and from Calton Hill by the creation of a limited triangular development of three single-sided terraces on the hill itself. These looked over a huge radial street pattern, centred on the gardens of Hillside Crescent, on the land to the north. The feuing of these lower lands started well, with Elm Row, Leopold Place, Windsor Street and the west side of Hillside Crescent being built fairly swiftly. However, demand for the feus faltered severely, due to the growing popularity of new properties being built to the west of the New Town. The fate of the Calton scheme was sealed in 1838, when it was decided that feuars should pay poor-rates to both Edinburgh and Leith. This virtually halted development for the next thirty years. The result of all these problems was that very little of Playfair's original scheme was ever built. When building resumed in the late 1880s, some of Playfair's original street lines were adhered to, as was the case with the western corner of Montgomery Street and Windsor Street and in others such as Hillside Crescent, Brunton Place, Brunswick Street, Hillside Street (originally to be a longer street called Hopeton Street), and Wellington Street (also curtailed). The revised scheme of the 1880s was designed by John Chesser who reworked and simplified some of Playfair's designs for the streets that had already been partly built, and designed the remainder of the streets in a more contemporary style. However, due to piecemeal residential, industrial and transport developments immediately to the north, it would have been impossible to further follow Playfair's original layout, even if this had been considered desirable.
External links are from the relevant listing authority and, where applicable, Wikidata. Wikidata IDs may be related buildings as well as this specific building. If you want to add or update a link, you will need to do so by editing the Wikidata entry.
Other nearby listed buildings